The River Avon rises in the Cotswolds and falls about 500 feet
(150 meters) in its 75-mile (120-kilometer) course to the Severn Estuary at
Avonmouth. Near Bristol it passes through a channel that was cut in the
nineteenth century to give access to oceangoing vessels, and then through the
steep Clifton Gorge, where it is daringly crossed by the Clifton Suspension
Bridge, 245 feet (75 meters) above the water. The iron structure, with a main
span of 702 feet (214 meters), challenged conventional wisdom and pushed the new
material and contemporary technology beyond the theoretical limits.
Bristol’s port of Avonmouth was a well-established center for coastwise and
international shipping. As the nineteenth century saw accelerating growth in
trade and economic prosperity, Bristol’s wealthier citizens wished to secure a
market share for their city, and the renown that went with it, in the face of
intense competition from such rivals as Liverpool. Perhaps they envied the
prestigious bridge at (Conwy, Wales, and the Menai Suspension Bridge, both
designed by the Scots engineer Thomas Telford. Funds were in hand to start the
project: the Bristol wine merchant William Vick, who died in 1754, had
bequeathed £1,000 to build a bridge across Clifton Gorge; the money had been
accruing interest while held in trust.A design competition, announced in May 1830, attracted twenty-two entries,
including four from the brilliant engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel, who was then
only twenty-four years old. The spans he proposed varied between 879 and 916
feet (267 and 279 meters); all were longer than any existing suspension bridge.
The jury short-listed four designs (one of Brunel’s among them), before seeking
Telford’s opinion. In an arrogant gesture he rejected all the
schemes. His given reason was pragmatic enough: his Menai bridge
(1819–1826) had almost been destroyed by crosswinds; it was nearly 579 feet (175
meters) long, and Telford believed that nothing over 600 feet (184 meters) was
feasible—the 700 feet across the exposed Clifton Gorge was out of the question.
The committee then asked him to submit an alternative design, but the three-span
bridge carried on soaring Gothic spires that he produced was unsuitable, even
comical. A second competition followed in October 1830, and Telford resubmitted
that design, only to see it again rejected. The twelve entries were reduced to
four finalists, and Brunel’s proposal, modified so that the main span was only
630 feet (192 meters), was placed second. He went to Bristol to meet the
committee and convinced them with arguments about the practicalities and the
esthetic quality of his tower design. He was appointed as engineer in 1831.
Brunel had an eye for the stunning landscape, with its high wooded cliffs,
and his “Egyptian” towers, although not his favorite stylistic alternative,
complemented the drama of the place. He had intended to have them inscribed with
hieroglyphs and crowned with sphinxes, but the cost was prohibitive. There were
delays for other reasons, including the 1831 Bristol riots associated with the
Reform Bill, but lack of funds was the main problem. Work did not start until
1836. More financial shortfalls caused an interruption in 1853, and the piers
stood untouched for some years, even being threatened with demolition. Reusing
chains from another of Brunel’s works, the demolished Hungerford Suspension
Bridge (1841–1845) in London, the Clifton Suspension Bridge was finally opened
in 1864, although the original design was not followed completely. Brunel had
died five years earlier.
See also
Menai Suspension
Bridge; Royal Albert
Bridge
Further reading
Body, Geoffrey, 1976. Clifton Suspension Bridge: An
Illustrated History. Wiltshire, UK: Moonraker Press.
Vaughan, Adrian. 1903. Isambard Kingdom Brunel,
Engineering Knight-Errant. London: John Murray
No comments:
Post a Comment