The Archigram group was established in 1961 by a few young
British architects “united by common interests and antipathies.” Its founders
were Peter Cook, Michael Webb, and David Greene, who were soon joined by Dennis
Crompton, Ron Herron, and Warren Chalk. Archigram’s international impact—its
architectural feat, so to speak—was significant. Other architects would give
form to its notions. The Centre Pompidou, Paris, by Renzo Piano and Richard
Rogers, and Arata Isozaki’s buildings at the 1970 Osaka World’s Fair are
redolent of the fantastic schemes drawn, but never built, by Archigram. The
Austrian architect Hans Hollein, too, admits his debt to them after 1964. It is
in the realm of ideas about living in an advanced industrial civilization that
they offered most.
All the founders had been students at the Architecture Association school in
London, where they had learned, in the face of a then-reactionary architectural
profession, to apply democratic principles to the art. The members who came
later assimilated those ideas and blended them with other influences, notably
the futuristic urban visions of Friedrich Kiesler and Bruno Taut and the
technological notions of Richard Buckminster Fuller, whom they heroized. They
also formed a symbiotic intellectual association with the exactly contemporary
Japanese Metabolist group, in which Isozaki was preeminent. The Japanese
applauded their efforts to “dismantle the apparatus of Modern Architecture.”Like the Dutch De Stijl group around 1920, Archigram’s cooperation was mainly through a polemical journal; and like the Hollanders, it drew its name from the title of the journal. Archigram (derived from “architecture” and “telegram” or “aerogram”) was published (almost) annually between 1961 and 1974. Archigram, more like a polemical broadsheet than a journal, directed an attack on the smugness of modernist architectural conservatism, reinforced by what can best be called Britishness. The powerful publication ran to ten annual issues, preaching an urgent message about architecture that has been described as “esthetic technocratic idealism.” Possibly the most significant architectural publication of the decade, its “pop” format, including beautifully drawn comic strips, declared the group’s “optimism and possibilities of technology and the counterculture of the pop generation.”
The 1964 issue, after a controversial “Living City” exhibition at London’s Institute of Contemporary Arts, attracted the critic Reyner Banham, who became the group’s champion. There followed a succession of (perhaps) outlandish architectural proposals. Archigram’s direction was urban, technological, autocratic—and some have said inhumane. The members believed that technology was the hope of the world, so traditional means of building houses and cities must be superseded. Their favorite
were change, adaptability, flexibility, metamorphosis,
impermanence, and ephemerality. Accordingly, they designed a living
environment that incorporated all kinds of gadgetry. They proposed an inflatable
bodysuit containing food, radio, and television, and the “suitaloon,” a house
carried on the back. These eccentric ideas extended from the individual to the
communal: Chalk’s Capsule Homes (1964) were projected alongside Cook’s
Plug-in City (1964–1966), in which self-contained living units could be
temporarily fitted into towering structural frames, and Herron’s nomadic
Walking City; in which skyscrapers could move on giant telescoping legs.
The group published its Instant City in 1968.
It has been suggested that in the 1960s Archigram was to modern architecture
what the Beatles were to modern music. But in the early 1970s they more or less
dispersed, Greene and Herron (for a while) becoming teachers in the United
States. Crompton, Cook, and Herron formed Archigram Architects (1970–1974).
Herron and Cook then established independent practices in various partnerships.
Crompton maintained links with the Architectural Association, and Greene turned
to writing poetry and practicing architecture. Webb moved permanently to the
United States and after 1975 taught at Cornell and Columbia Universities in New
York. Chalk continued writing and teaching in the United States and England,
mostly at the Architectural Association, until he died in 1987.
See also
Industrialized
building; Pompidou Center
(Beaubourg)
Further reading
Archigram. (1961–1974). 10 issues (numbers
1-91/2). London: Archigram.
Cook, Peter, ed. 1972. Archigram. London: Studio
Vista.
Crompton, Dennis ed. 1994. A Guide to Archigram,
1961–1974. London: Architectural Press
words
No comments:
Post a Comment